The U.S. government's proposed imposition of substantial fines on Chinese-built vessels docking at American ports has ignited concerns across the maritime industry. Atlantic Container Line (ACL), a specialized ocean carrier, warns that these measures could compel it to cease U.S. operations, potentially destabilizing global supply chains and inflating freight rates to levels reminiscent of the COVID-19 pandemic era.​

Background on Proposed Fines

In an effort to bolster domestic shipbuilding and counter China's maritime dominance, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has proposed levying fees ranging from $500,000 to $1.5 million per port call on Chinese-built ships. The exact fee would depend on the proportion of Chinese vessels in a carrier's fleet and those on order. This initiative has sparked widespread opposition from over 300 trade groups, who argue that the U.S. lacks the capacity to win an economic confrontation that places ocean carriers using Chinese-made vessels at a disadvantage. ​

Impact on Atlantic Container Line

ACL, the world's oldest continually operating container line and a subsidiary of Italy's Grimaldi Group, specializes in combination container-roll-on-roll-off (ConRo) ships operating between North America and Northern Europe. CEO Andrew Abbott emphasizes that the proposed fines would render ACL uncompetitive in U.S. trades, stating, "If this happens, we’re out of business and we’re going to have to shut down." ​

Consequences for U.S. Exporters and Importers

The potential withdrawal of ACL from the U.S. market would significantly impact American manufacturers and exporters. As the primary North Atlantic carrier of oversized and project cargo to Europe, ACL transports a substantial portion of U.S. construction and agricultural equipment, vehicles, and aircraft components, including Airbus wings produced domestically. Abbott highlights the challenge of finding alternative carriers for such specialized cargo, noting that without ACL, "you’d have to find another breakbulk ship." ​

Broader Industry Implications

The proposed fines have elicited concerns from major ocean carriers and industry analysts. Executives warn that the additional costs could lead to rerouting cargo to alternative ports, exacerbating congestion and delaying deliveries. Soren Toft, CEO of MSC, the world's largest ocean carrier, indicated that ports like Oakland might be bypassed in favor of alternatives such as Los Angeles and Long Beach. ​

Analysts caution that these measures could lead to freight rate increases akin to those experienced during the pandemic. Peter Sand, Chief Analyst at Xeneta, suggests that carriers might reduce U.S. port calls to mitigate fees, potentially causing significant congestion and delays across American maritime gateways. ​

Challenges in U.S. Shipbuilding Capacity

While the policy aims to rejuvenate U.S. shipbuilding, industry leaders question its feasibility. Abbott points out that American shipyards are currently unable to meet commercial demands, as they are predominantly occupied with military contracts. He explains, "The only reason why I use the Chinese is because when we went to the American yards, they told me they couldn’t build a ship for seven years." ​

‍

The USTR's proposed fines on Chinese-built vessels present a complex challenge for the maritime industry, with potential repercussions for carriers like ACL, American exporters and importers, and the broader global supply chain. As the situation evolves, stakeholders must carefully assess the economic and logistical implications to navigate this uncertain landscape effectively.

‍