After nearly four years of intense legal disputes, Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have officially reached a settlement, bringing their high-profile case to a close. The agreement follows last week’s development where the SEC opted to drop its appeal unconditionally. In response, Ripple has agreed to withdraw its cross-appeal, according to Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty, who announced the resolution on X (formerly Twitter) on Tuesday.
As part of the final agreement, the SEC will retain $50 million of the $125 million fine originally imposed on Ripple. The remaining $75 million will be refunded to the company, providing financial relief after years of legal uncertainty. The withheld amount had already been placed in an escrow account, ensuring a swift resolution.
Additionally, Alderoty confirmed that the SEC will request the court to lift the standard injunction, which had previously restricted Ripple’s ability to operate freely. However, before the case is fully closed, the settlement still requires:
A spokesperson for the SEC declined to comment on the details of the deal, maintaining the agency's standard practice of not discussing ongoing legal settlements.
The Ripple lawsuit, which began in December 2020, was one of the most closely watched cases in crypto history. The SEC alleged that Ripple had conducted an unregistered securities offering by selling XRP, a claim Ripple fiercely disputed. The lawsuit quickly became a defining battle for the crypto industry, as it had broader implications on how U.S. securities laws apply to digital assets.
Throughout the case, Ripple argued that XRP should be classified as a digital currency rather than a security, emphasizing that the company did not conduct an initial coin offering (ICO) and that XRP sales did not meet the criteria outlined in the Howey Test, a legal framework used to determine whether an asset qualifies as a security.
This case also unfolded under the leadership of SEC Chair Gary Gensler, who took an aggressive approach to regulating the crypto industry. However, the lawsuit's conclusion suggests a shifting regulatory landscape.
The settlement comes at a time when the SEC appears to be scaling back its aggressive enforcement actions against the crypto industry. Since President Donald Trump began his second term in January, the regulatory landscape has undergone noticeable shifts:
This more balanced approach indicates that Washington may be moving toward a more innovation-friendly regulatory stance, rather than the previous all-out crackdown on crypto companies. While investor protection remains a priority, regulators appear to be considering ways to foster technological advancement without stifling the industry.
With the SEC lawsuit behind it, Ripple is now free to focus on expanding its global presence. The company has already been making moves in cross-border payments and blockchain-based financial solutions, working with banks and financial institutions worldwide.
For the broader crypto industry, the Ripple case serves as a critical precedent that may influence how regulators handle future cases involving digital assets. As new legislation and guidelines emerge, crypto firms are hopeful for clearer regulatory frameworks that define the status of digital assets without relying solely on enforcement actions.
The resolution of the Ripple-SEC lawsuit marks the end of a major regulatory battle and potentially the beginning of a new era for crypto regulation in the U.S. As Washington adopts a more measured approach, companies in the digital asset space may find greater opportunities for growth and innovation while still adhering to legal compliance.