The Federal Reserve learned the hard way that inflation is not always "transitory." In 2021, as the U.S. economy roared back from pandemic lockdowns, consumer prices started to surge. Fed officials, including Chair Jerome Powell, initially dismissed it as a short-term issue. That miscalculation forced the Fed into its most aggressive interest rate hiking cycle since the 1980s, with rates rising from near zero to a peak of 5.5% by mid-2023.

While inflation has cooled significantly from its peak of 9.1% in June 2022, criticism lingers over the Fed’s late response. Now, with Donald Trump poised to enact sweeping tariffs and a pro-growth agenda if he returns to the White House, the central bank is facing a new challenge: Can it respond effectively this time?

Trump’s Economic Plan: A Recipe for Inflation?

Trump’s economic policies have always revolved around tariffs, tax cuts, and deregulation. In just the first two months of his current administration, he has already proposed a series of aggressive tariffs, including a plan to impose a 20% duty on Chinese imports—doubling previous rates.

And it’s not stopping there. On Wednesday, Trump is expected to announce a new round of tariffs aimed at matching foreign trade restrictions on U.S. goods. These tariffs could significantly raise the cost of imported goods, further fueling inflationary pressures. The result? A potential economic cocktail of rising prices and stagnant growth—commonly known as "stagflation."

Lessons From the Fed’s 2020 Framework

The Federal Reserve’s past mistakes can be traced back to its 2020 policy framework, which prioritized job growth over inflation concerns. At the time, the Fed was still haunted by the slow recovery from the 2008 financial crisis, where unemployment remained high for years. Policymakers underestimated how quickly the post-pandemic labor market would bounce back, failing to predict the wage-price spiral that helped push inflation to its highest level in four decades.

Laurence Ball, an economist at Johns Hopkins University, points out that "the 2020 framework placed more emphasis on full employment," which meant inflation took a backseat—until it was too late.

A New Inflation Strategy for the Fed?

As the Fed conducts its latest policy review—something it does every five years—economists are debating whether it should adjust its inflation target. Currently, the central bank aims for 2% inflation, but some experts, like MIT’s Kristin Forbes, argue for a more flexible range of 1.5% to 2.5% to better accommodate economic shocks.

Powell has insisted that the 2% target will remain, but the Fed is also reassessing how it communicates policy shifts. Former Fed governor Laurence Meyer believes the Fed’s biggest mistake was its language: "Calling inflation ‘transitory’ damaged credibility. They should have simply said ‘temporary’ instead."

What’s Next? Watching the Data—and Trump’s Moves

As Trump’s policies unfold, the Fed will be closely monitoring key inflation indicators. One major warning sign emerged just last Friday: The University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey showed inflation expectations for the next five to ten years jumped to their highest level since 1993.

If tariffs push prices higher while economic growth slows, the Fed could be forced into an impossible dilemma—either cut rates to prevent a recession and risk stoking inflation, or keep rates high and hurt job growth.

Emi Nakamura, an economist at UC Berkeley, sums up the challenge: "You don’t want to be fighting the last war. The Fed has to adapt to the current economic reality."

With Trump’s economic policies already reshaping the landscape, one thing is clear: The Federal Reserve’s inflation test isn’t over—it’s just entering its next chapter.

‍