Protesters with Palestinian flags during a demonstration outside the Norges Bank headquarters in Oslo, Norway, on Thursday, March 27, 2025.
Norway’s government is facing increasing calls to overturn a long-standing ban that prevents its massive $1.8 trillion sovereign wealth fund—the largest in the world—from investing in defense companies. With geopolitical tensions rising, opposition parties argue that maintaining the restriction is outdated and counterproductive to national and allied security interests.
Since the early 2000s, Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) has followed strict ethical guidelines, prohibiting investments in firms involved in nuclear weapons, cluster munitions, anti-personnel landmines, and other controversial sectors, including tobacco. However, with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and China’s increasing military expansion, some lawmakers believe these restrictions need urgent reassessment.
Tina Bru, deputy leader of the Conservative Party, emphasized the need for change, citing the evolving security threats. “We are facing the most serious security crisis since World War II. Western nations, including Norway, must invest in defense to ensure both our own security and that of our allies,” Bru told CNBC. She argued that the wealth fund should not be barred from investing in companies that are vital to Western defense and security.
The push for reform is gaining traction among Norway’s political right. The Conservative Party and the right-wing Progress Party argue that preventing GPFG from investing in defense companies is inconsistent with the government's own defense procurement strategies. Norway’s military already purchases critical defense equipment from firms that the sovereign wealth fund is prohibited from investing in, including British aerospace giant BAE Systems and U.S. defense contractor Lockheed Martin.
Hans Andreas Limi, a lawmaker from the Progress Party, recently introduced a private members’ bill aimed at reversing the fund’s ban on nuclear weapons-related investments. He called the existing restrictions “hypocritical,” arguing that Norway should not exclude companies from its investments while simultaneously relying on their defense products.
Despite mounting pressure, the Norwegian government has remained non-committal. When asked about potential changes, a finance ministry spokesperson stated that the government would first address the issue in parliament. Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre’s center-left Labour Party is currently governing alone following the collapse of its coalition government earlier this year. With parliamentary elections set for September, it remains uncertain whether the ruling party will alter its stance before then.
Norway, a founding member of NATO, does not belong to the European Union but maintains close ties with the bloc through the European Economic Area (EEA). Given its geopolitical positioning, the country’s investment policies hold significant weight in both financial and security circles.
The debate over Norway’s sovereign wealth fund comes at a time when defense stocks are seeing a sharp rise in demand. Governments across Europe and North America are ramping up military spending in response to heightened global threats, leading to record profits for major defense firms.
Traditionally, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles have led many funds to exclude defense stocks due to ethical concerns. However, recent trends suggest a shift in investor sentiment. More ESG fund managers are reconsidering defense investments, arguing that security and stability are essential components of sustainable governance.
Norges Bank Investment Management, which oversees the wealth fund, declined to comment on the ongoing discussions. Currently, GPFG has stakes in over 8,650 companies across 60 countries, making it one of the most influential investors in the global market.
As the world’s geopolitical landscape shifts, Norway faces a crucial decision: Should it uphold its ethical investment restrictions, or should it adapt to the new security realities and allow its sovereign wealth fund to support defense firms? The answer could shape not only Norway’s economic strategy but also its role in global security partnerships.
With parliamentary elections on the horizon and ongoing discussions among policymakers, investors will be closely watching whether Norway chooses to maintain its traditional stance or embrace a more flexible approach to defense investments.